Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Qianwen3.8 Flash took the longest among the four models, with an average time per project approximately two to three times that of the other models, exhibiting a serious overthinking problem.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/23/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/22/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified4.1 Flash completed a long-horizon programming task in 21 minutes consuming 32.1 million tokens, but exhibited three noticeable front-end bugs.79% similarUnverifiedRunning a Web UI task of approximately 20k tokens in Google AI Studio compare mode, 3.8 Flash was faster than 3.7 Flash by 1.7 seconds and 2.5 seconds respectively, with a total elapsed time of approximately 45 seconds.70% similarUnverifiedIn a web-based Excel generation test, V4 Flash took 9 minutes and 47 seconds and cost 0.17 yuan (off-peak hours), while V4.1 Flash took 21 minutes and cost 3.68 yuan (peak hours).69% similarUnverifiedThe entire design process took a total of 3 hours and 14 minutes, with the model's thinking intensity set to high, consuming approximately 52 million tokens in total63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/943530API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/943530MCP
get_claim(id=943530)