Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The same paper may receive vastly different scores under different combinations of reviewers, meaning peer review has inherent randomness.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/23/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified"Review Lottery" refers to the phenomenon where whether a paper is accepted depends largely on the randomly assigned reviewers rather than the paper's own quality.75% similarUnverifiedMore rigorous evaluation designs may need to draw on the logic of randomized controlled experiments, directly collecting researchers' original creative records prior to publication decisions in order to construct a comparable human baseline.70% similarUnverified多评判者投票系统在多个存在不同偏差的评判者独立评分时偏差方向相互抵消，聚合结论可靠性高于单一评判者69% similarUnverifiedCritics point out that reusing review comments may lead to the problem of "one bad review, repeated suffering across multiple venues."68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/943655API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/943655MCP
get_claim(id=943655)