Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's API spending is approximately 6 times cheaper than GPT-6 Astra's, but consumed 5 times the tokens and took 3 times as long to build
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/23/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/7/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the OpenDesign Arena evaluation, DeepSeek v4.1 Flash achieved 98% of the Astra model's score at a cost equivalent to 1.4% of Astra's.76% similarUnverifiedUnder the premise of identical task completion quality, the Astra solution costs $0.43 per task while the DeepSeek V4.1-Flash solution costs $6.52 per task, a difference of more than 15 times.74% similarUnverifiedThe per-task cost of GPT-6 Astra is cheaper than that of the previous generation.73% similarUnverifiedIn this 15-round evaluation, Claude Fable 5.1 took a total of 9 hours 35 minutes and cost $513.36; GPT-6 Astra took a total of 11 hours 19 minutes and cost $326.98 — Astra was approximately $186 cheaper overall but took about 1 hour 43 minutes longer than Fable.70% similarUnverifiedWhen using the DeepSeek V3 Flash model on Bailian or Volcano Ark's 39.9 yuan or 49.9 yuan plans, credits are consumed extremely quickly, making them less cost-effective than purchasing DeepSeek's official service directly69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/944195API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/944195MCP
get_claim(id=944195)