Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Being questioned does not equal being correct; the vast majority of predictions that were opposed ultimately turned out to be false.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/24/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe normalization discrepancy in the paper was severe enough that one conclusion appeared to directly contradict a known theorem.74% similarUnverifiedA correct type does not mean a correct judgment; high-confidence results can still be wrong.73% similarUnverifiedWhen a model lacks up-to-date information, it may not admit ignorance, but instead fabricate seemingly plausible yet factually incorrect answers (hallucinations).73% similarUnverifiedConflating engineering constraints with principled constraints—whether excessively pessimistic or blindly optimistic—will lead to misjudgment.71% similarUnverifiedThe poster is uncertain whether prompt injection leading to privilege escalation is a case that has actually occurred or remains at the theoretical level.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/946702API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/946702MCP
get_claim(id=946702)