Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
Permission design should follow the principle of opening up read access while tightening execution access, prohibiting the Agent from executing any real order placement, transfers, or fund movements.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/24/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified不应将文档中的Agent指令作为安全或权限控制手段，真正的护栏应由工具层面的权限限制、代码审查和自动化测试保证74% similarUnverifiedWhen the permissions claim is empty, there is a semantic ambiguity: it may mean the user genuinely has no permissions, or it may mean permission information was not written into the token, and the default behavior must be explicitly agreed upon at the design stage.66% similarUnverifiedAgent permissions should be opened up progressively: the first level allows reading data but not writing to business systems; the second level allows proposals that require human approval; the third level allows entry into ERP/MES/CRM to place orders and change schedules after human approval; and only the fourth level grants autonomous execution within a defined scope, with monetary limits, whitelists, logs, rollback capabilities, and human takeover in place.65% similarUnverifiedFor sensitive decisions involving copyright and legal liability, a human review step should be retained.64% similarUnverifiedProtective measures for coding Agents include the principle of least privilege (running in a sandbox or container), cautious handling of untrusted content, monitoring vendor announcements, and disabling unnecessary plugins.62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/948518API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/948518MCP
get_claim(id=948518)