Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
A third-party test classifying 1,000 emails found the judgment model took 15.6 seconds at a cost of 1.77, while the large model took 48.9 seconds at a cost of 2.07—approximately 15% lower cost but roughly three times faster.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/25/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/24/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified工作量证明对单封邮件只需几秒钟计算，但对批量群发数百万封邮件的垃圾邮件发送者计算成本呈线性增长74% similarUnverifiedAfter 15 training epochs on the demonstration dataset, the text classification model achieves an accuracy of 99%, with a total of 110,000 model parameters (16,000 for Attention, 33,000 for FFN, and the remainder for Embedding)67% similarUnverified自动微分在保持机器精度的同时，计算开销仅为前向传播的常数倍（通常2-5倍）64% similarUnverifiedThe host's own testing found that minimal mode completes tasks approximately one-third faster than standard mode, with results comparable to standard mode.62% similarUnverifiedAccording to official performance tests, a search on a graph with 118,000 nodes saw response time drop from 24 milliseconds to 0.004 milliseconds, a speedup of approximately 6,000 times.62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/950993API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/950993MCP
get_claim(id=950993)