Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On a GitHub project comprehension task, GPT-5.6 Soar took 3 minutes and 4 seconds and consumed 3% of quota, while GPT-6 Soar took 1 minute and 14 seconds and consumed 2% of quota.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/26/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/10/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Partially VerifiedGPT-5.6 has improved the prompt caching mechanism by adding explicit cache breakpoints, with a minimum cache retention of 30 minutes and output speeds of up to hundreds of tokens per second.76% similarUnverifiedOn simple tasks such as drawing a pear-blossom cat riding a bicycle in SVG, GPT-6 Soar and GPT-5.6 Soar took nearly the same amount of time, both exceeding two minutes.75% similarUnverifiedCompared to GPT-5.5, GPT-5.6 consumes approximately one-third of the Tokens per PR, and the median completion time is nearly halved.75% similarUnverifiedGPT-5.6's peak pass rate under a two-hour limit on ExploitGym increased from 15.1% to 24.9%, and reached 33.7% when the limit was extended to 6 hours.75% similarPartially VerifiedAll three GPT-5.6 models achieved a perfect score of 10 on the long-horizon agent fine-tuning task, while GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.7 could only score two or three points on that task.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/951541API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/951541MCP
get_claim(id=951541)