Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In a test checking whether AI-modified code could be accepted by a project, Opus 5.5 using the default setting scored slightly higher than Astra's best publicly available score, and the cost per task was approximately one-fifth of Astra's.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/30/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/29/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified在业务自动化评测中，相同单任务成本下Opus 5的通过率约为次优模型的1.5倍76% similarUnverifiedAstra performed best on computer operation tasks; Sol's score of 60.5% was close to Opus 5's 60.3%, with a per-task cost approximately 80% lower.75% similarUnverifiedIn code review tests, Opus 5.5 improved recall on more difficult pull requests from a baseline of 54% to nearly 77%, but the number of comments increased by approximately 20%.69% similarUnverifiedIn the live test, the webpage creation task used Astra at medium reasoning intensity, consuming the remaining 5-hour quota from 79% down to 73% and the monthly quota from 88% down to 81%.66% similarUnverifiedPure AI testing solutions have three major practical pain points: output randomness, high token consumption costs, and slow execution efficiency.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/961525API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/961525MCP
get_claim(id=961525)