Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
At vision conferences such as CVPR and ECCV, rebuttals have traditionally had a relatively limited impact on final outcomes, with a low proportion of reviewers changing their scores.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/1/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified多项针对ACL、EMNLP、ICLR等会议的统计分析显示，rebuttal导致审稿人实质性提分的概率通常低于20%67% similarUnverified作者强调99.3%不是CFC准确率的普遍值，也不是Gemini的通用可靠性评分，只是该特定可复现决策闭合基准上的分数64% similarUnverified在事实性评估任务上模型评判者准确率仍显著低于人类专家，但在风格、连贯性等主观维度已接近人类评审员间一致性水平63% similarUnverifiedFindings papers go through the same peer review process as main conference papers, but are ranked slightly below the main conference acceptance threshold in the final ranking.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/963673API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/963673MCP
get_claim(id=963673)