Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The Supreme Court of Canada has established in multiple rulings the principle that consent must be 'contemporaneous, conscious, and ongoing,' and voluntary intoxication itself does not constitute a premise for valid consent.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/2/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedFreedom of expression in Canada is protected under Section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and regulations restricting speech must pass the reasonable limits test under Section 1.67% similarUnverifiedCanadian courts have historically struck down locally enacted speech restriction bylaws with vague wording on multiple occasions, citing Section 2(b) of the Charter.65% similarUnverifiedFederal courts typically apply the "deliberate indifference" standard when determining whether prison conditions are unconstitutional.61% similarUnverifiedJudicial immunity is a principle in common law systems; its core is that judges generally do not bear personal civil liability for erroneous judgments made in the exercise of their judicial functions.57% similarUnverifiedThe U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed in multiple rulings that a chilling effect itself can constitute a violation of First Amendment rights.57% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/966449API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/966449MCP
get_claim(id=966449)