Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
During collaboration, Opus 5.5 pushes back on the author and explains why an idea is flawed, and also runs changes on a 'time-shifted copy' of PNN first to catch bugs on its own
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/31/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified在已使用DiCE生成反事实的前提下，SHAP在最终规则蒸馏中是否真正发挥作用是作者自己也在追问的可替换环节55% similarUnverifiedA Reddit user reported that when collaborating with Claude Opus 5.5, the AI named generated files 'continue,' 'decide for yourself,' and 'whatever, all good.'54% similarUnverifiedThe project was born after roycho87 criticized a MiniMax workflow on the Civitai platform and was met with a response and a block from the original author.52% similarUnverifiedPraxis is not positioned as a paper reproduction tool, but rather translates the research ideas in a paper into a reviewable engineering blueprint.51% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/967183API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/967183MCP
get_claim(id=967183)