Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The narrative framework of 'the model is too powerful to release publicly' is difficult for external parties to independently verify, because the party claiming the capability is dangerous is also the judge of how dangerous it is, creating information asymmetry.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/2/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe study points out a trade-off between safety and verisimilitude, where an overly broad definition of harmlessness makes models behave clumsily in adversarial scenarios.79% similarUnverifiedRelying on prompt constraints to prevent dangerous operations is inherently unreliable, because the model may be jailbroken, make misjudgments, or forget constraints during long conversations.77% similarUnverifiedDue to models' prompt sensitivity and hallucination phenomena, any single screenshot or conversation record is extremely difficult to use as reliable evidence of AI capabilities or risks.74% similarUnverified由于大语言模型存在提示词注入攻击风险和幻觉问题，权限过大的Agent可能在被恶意输入诱导或判断失误时对业务数据、外部系统造成不可逆破坏73% similarUnverifiedRelying solely on model-side safety training is considered insufficient to address the risks posed by agents in real-world environments73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/967428API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/967428MCP
get_claim(id=967428)