Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In ARR, submission and entry into review are two separate events; the system waits until the cycle deadline to formally begin assignment for that batch of papers.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/2/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedACL ARR review results can be reused within a certain cycle; authors may choose to commit to a conference or Findings, or withdraw and re-enter with existing reviews in a subsequent cycle.72% similarUnverifiedUnder the ARR model, a monthly submission window is open for papers, and after reviews are completed by a unified reviewer pool, authors can submit their papers along with review comments to the program committees of different conferences.71% similarUnverifiedAcceptance through review does not equal publication; authors must also complete the commitment action within a specified time, and the commitment deadline is often only a few days after the review results are announced.71% similarUnverifiedThe rollout of ARR distributes submission windows across multiple cycles throughout the year, theoretically alleviating the review pressure caused by concentrated deadlines.69% similarUnverifiedSome conferences have begun piloting rolling review mechanisms that decouple submission cycles from conference dates in order to smooth the review load.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/968854API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/968854MCP
get_claim(id=968854)