Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Some conferences have an 'Area Chair' role responsible for arbitrating when author and reviewer opinions are at an impasse and making the final decision on acceptance or rejection.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/3/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen there is a clear disagreement among reviewers or a procedural issue arises, the AC has the authority to ask reviewers to reconsider their opinions or even invite additional reviewers to participate in the evaluation.68% similarUnverifiedSimilar reviewing obligation rules exist in various forms at other top conferences, such as requiring corresponding authors or senior authors to handle a certain number of reviews.67% similarUnverifiedThe target audience of the rebuttal stage is not only the reviewers but also the area chair, who may influence the final decision.66% similarUnverifiedThe group chat debate/committee pattern converges conclusions through cross-examination and arbitration voting among multiple expert Agents, and is suitable for high-accuracy, high-risk decision-making scenarios.66% similarUnverifiedSome conferences have experimented with introducing meta-reviewer systems, open peer review, or reviewer incentive mechanisms to mitigate review quality issues, but no widely recognized systematic solution has emerged.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/971041API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/971041MCP
get_claim(id=971041)