Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In Every team's tests, 12 passages had errors planted in them; Jev caught 6 out of 7 in 0.35 seconds, Claude Fable 5.1 caught all 7 but took 8.83 seconds, and Jev was approximately 580x cheaper.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/4/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/2/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn Mike Taylor's experiment, Jev read 37 documents in under 0.7 seconds, answered 21 questions for each document, returned a total of 777 judgments, with an estimated cost of approximately one quarter of a cent.69% similarUnverifiedIn the fourth round of fusion experiments, treating JEV as the 9th framework and taking the highest score yielded an overall accuracy of 81.5%, but parity dropped back to 50%.67% similarUnverifiedOn tasks such as classification and true/false judgment, Jev requires only a few milliseconds to respond and costs 20 to 200 times less than existing models available for comparable tasks.67% similarUnverifiedThe official Jev manual notes that the Hermes agent has 182 skills; when the agent selects skills on its own, the rate of incorrectly loaded skills is approximately 17%, which drops to 7% after Jev's recommendations.66% similarUnverifiedJCE所谓的'可靠'实际只有约60%的准确率，因误差累积连续5步后整体成功率仅剩约7.8%62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/975195API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/975195MCP
get_claim(id=975195)