Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On the Pick-a-Pic dataset using DreamSim as the diversity metric, with FLUX.1-dev as the base model and HPSv3 as the reward model, SatisDive improved the worst candidate reward by up to 0.43 compared to FK steering.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/5/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/3/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWith SANA-1.6B as the base model and ImageReward as the reward model, SatisDive improved the worst candidate reward by up to 0.70 compared to FK steering.73% similarUnverifiedThe leading closed-source models each scored 53 points in that evaluation, which is 7 points higher than the Xiaomi model.59% similarUnverifiedGrok 4.5 leads on the SWE Marathon benchmark, with Fable 5 performing worse, possibly due to data XAI obtained through its acquisition of Cursor.56% similarUnverifiedOne meta-agent variant achieved the highest Avg@3 reward on five of the six benchmarks.56% similarUnverifiedIn EvoArena testing, GPT-5.5, which achieved the highest Step Level score, had an accuracy of just over 50%, while Gemini-3.1 Pro and GLM-5.1, which performed best at the Chain Level, reached only approximately 28%–29%.55% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/975683API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/975683MCP
get_claim(id=975683)