Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Training simultaneously across 4 harnesses improved Liquid AI's LFM2.5-2.6B model score from 42% to 54%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/6/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/4/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedLFM2.5在多项基准测试中展现出与体量高达其4倍模型相当的竞争力67% similarUnverifiedIn the experiment, the 27B model scored 61.0% on LiveMath when skills were written by the 4B model, whereas it scored 56.3% when it wrote the skills itself64% similarUnverified一个rank=4的LoRA文件对于SD1.5模型约只有3-6MB，LoRA设计使训练参数量减少95%以上63% similarUnverifiedOn the AI Builder model intelligence leaderboard, Claude Opus 5.5 Max topped the rankings with 58 points, Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro ranked 9th with 46 points, and Qwen 3.8 Max ranked 10th with 45 points.63% similarUnverifiedEmsyAI was trained for 15,000 steps using FP16 mixed precision, with validation perplexity converging to 5.8661% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/980173API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/980173MCP
get_claim(id=980173)