Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
LFM2.5在多项基准测试中展现出与体量高达其4倍模型相当的竞争力
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
8/13/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/11/2026
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe evaluator found that GLM 5.2 remains strong in pure coding, but HY3 outperforms it in tasks involving aesthetics, physics feel, and simulation texture.69% similarUnverifiedIn actual performance tests, GLM 4.6 far outperformed Claude 4.5 Haiku.68% similarUnverifiedLFM2.5 improved by 74 points in a telecom test simulating real agent scenarios, achieved an instruction-following IFEval score of 91.8, and a mathematical reasoning Math500 score of 88.8.66% similarUnverifiedGLM4 scored 46.2% on the SWE-Bench benchmark, significantly outperforming the previous generation model.66% similarUnverifiedLFM2.5 has 8.3 billion total parameters but only 1.5 billion parameters activated per inference66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/742624API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/742624MCP
get_claim(id=742624)