Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
TEMPEST outperforms the best classical model by 17.9 percentage points and the strongest triplet-loss baseline by 58.4 percentage points.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/7/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAt 16× compression, AdaMem's substring match improves by up to 3.2 percentage points (5.5%) over the uniform allocation baseline, with an average relative gain of 3.4%.68% similarUnverifiedThe leading closed-source models each scored 53 points in that evaluation, which is 7 points higher than the Xiaomi model.68% similarUnverifiedThe Top3 configuration, which uses the fewest metrics, achieved the highest average performance, indicating that fewer metrics actually yield higher performance under this experimental setting.66% similarUnverifiedIn EvoArena testing, GPT-5.5, which achieved the highest Step Level score, had an accuracy of just over 50%, while Gemini-3.1 Pro and GLM-5.1, which performed best at the Chain Level, reached only approximately 28%–29%.66% similarUnverifiedExperience internalization fine-tuning improved Qwen3-8B-27B's one-shot score from 37.07 to 48.22, while reducing generated tokens from 6.41 million to 570,000 (an 11-fold reduction).65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/983177API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/983177MCP
get_claim(id=983177)