Cloud Opus 5

The publisher claims that DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 surpasses Cloud Opus 5 on long-horizon tasks

In the long-form female-oriented fiction scenario, Cloud received the highest overall score of 9.5, with its core advantage being smooth body-text generation that requires few post-generation edits.

Bilibili UP主 Xingyue organized a multi-dimensional AI model novel-writing evaluation covering six mainstream large models (Gemini 3.8 Flash High, Cloud Opus 5, GPT 5.6, DeepSeek V4, Qianwen 3.8, and GLM 5.3).

In the overall ranking, GPT 5.6 placed second with an average score of 7.17, Cloud Opus 5 placed third with 6.56, and GLM 5.3 placed fourth with 5.67.

Model selection recommendations: use Qianwen for short fiction, GPT 5.6 for outline architecture and manuscript review, Gemini for brainstorming under deadline pressure, Cloud for emotional atmosphere, and GLM 5.3 for female-oriented contemporary romance body text.

When Borgia performed an SEO audit, Jev read all 586 pages of the website and rebuilt the internal link map in 45.1 seconds for $0.21, while Claude Opus 5 read only 21 pages and cost $1.43.

According to analysis by a Bilibili UP host, V4.1 Flash matches or even surpasses Cloud Opus 5 on some performance metrics, while its price is only one-tenth of the latter's.

In automated business process testing, GPT-6 Sol outperformed Claude Opus 5, with a per-task cost of approximately 9% of the latter.