[KongchangAI]
Product

Optimist Deep Research

An open-source iterative literature research agent system centered on an explicit research state. It supports sub-question tree decomposition, multi-source retrieval, citation snowball expansion, a structured evidence base and an eight-dimensional review mechanism, aiming to simulate the working style of human researchers.

Timeline (last 90 days)

Oct 19

Optimist Deep Research is an open-source project that proposes an iterative evidence-acquisition approach centered on an explicit, mutable research state.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

Optimist Deep Research decomposes the research question into a tree of sub-questions, each driven by several search intents.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

Optimist Deep Research's search intents are translated into specific queries targeting arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and the open web.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

Optimist Deep Research's retrieval results pass through a conservative four-tier deduplication hierarchy and are merged into a normalized document registry that retains source information.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

Optimist Deep Research expands the document registry via citation snowballing until a saturation criterion is met.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

Optimist Deep Research introduces a critic role that reviews the research state along eight dimensions and returns research actions rather than binary judgments.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

The critic can add, split, rewrite, downgrade, or close sub-questions, making the research plan both an input to and an output of the investigation.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

Optimist Deep Research's final report is written section by section based on the evidence base, and every citation can be traced back to an actually retrieved document.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

In the case study reported by the authors, Optimist Deep Research retrieved 237 documents in about three and a half minutes and actually read 28 of them.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

The authors acknowledge that the case study exposed weaknesses in Optimist Deep Research, showing that state-centric agent design is still at an early stage.

Unverified50%

1 more timeline events

All Facts (11)

Unverified

Optimist Deep Research is an open-source project that proposes an iterative evidence-acquisition approach centered on an explicit, mutable research state.

50%
Unverified

Optimist Deep Research decomposes the research question into a tree of sub-questions, each driven by several search intents.

50%
Unverified

Optimist Deep Research's search intents are translated into specific queries targeting arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and the open web.

50%
Unverified

Optimist Deep Research's retrieval results pass through a conservative four-tier deduplication hierarchy and are merged into a normalized document registry that retains source information.

50%
Unverified

Optimist Deep Research expands the document registry via citation snowballing until a saturation criterion is met.

50%
Unverified

Optimist Deep Research introduces a critic role that reviews the research state along eight dimensions and returns research actions rather than binary judgments.

50%
Unverified

The critic can add, split, rewrite, downgrade, or close sub-questions, making the research plan both an input to and an output of the investigation.

50%
Unverified

Optimist Deep Research's final report is written section by section based on the evidence base, and every citation can be traced back to an actually retrieved document.

50%
Unverified

In the case study reported by the authors, Optimist Deep Research retrieved 237 documents in about three and a half minutes and actually read 28 of them.

50%
Unverified

The authors acknowledge that the case study exposed weaknesses in Optimist Deep Research, showing that state-centric agent design is still at an early stage.

50%
Unverified

Automatic assessment of evidence strength remains an open problem, and the current system may rely on heuristic rules or model scoring, whose reliability needs to be verified in more cases.

50%

Source Articles