Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On the avg@16 metric for math tasks, BranchOPD improves over Vanilla OPD by 18.55 percentage points.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedGLM-5.3的智能体编程准确率随投入词元增加而提升：低投入约24.7，高投入31.5，最大投入34.762% similarUnverifiedIn tests on 2,456 held-out prompts, increasing the sampling steps from 20 to 50 improved FID only from 27.0 to 26.6 (a gain of 0.4), while removing the shift caused FID to rise from 27.0 to 27.3 and FD-DINOv2 to rise from 218 to 228.61% similarUnverifiedAt 16× compression, AdaMem's substring match improves by up to 3.2 percentage points (5.5%) over the uniform allocation baseline, with an average relative gain of 3.4%.61% similarUnverifiedTEMPEST outperforms the best classical model by 17.9 percentage points and the strongest triplet-loss baseline by 58.4 percentage points.61% similarUnverifiedAfter using TailSFT, the pass@16 metric on coding tasks during the SFT phase showed an absolute improvement of up to 16.8 points.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1001143API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1001143MCP
get_claim(id=1001143)