Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In the test, SupaVoxel's generation time was recorded as 304.808 seconds, while Meshy's generation time was not recorded; Meshy consumed 35 credits and SupaVoxel consumed 3 credits, but these belong to different plans and units and do not constitute a price comparison.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/26/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn Every team's tests, 12 passages had errors planted in them; Jev caught 6 out of 7 in 0.35 seconds, Claude Fable 5.1 caught all 7 but took 8.83 seconds, and Jev was approximately 580x cheaper.63% similarUnverifiedIn the author's independent tests, Meshy scored 59/100 and SupaVoxel scored 89/100, with the scoring difference coming mainly from engineering efficiency rather than the models' visual appearance quality.61% similarUnverifiedAccording to official performance tests, a search on a graph with 118,000 nodes saw response time drop from 24 milliseconds to 0.004 milliseconds, a speedup of approximately 6,000 times.60% similarUnverifiedgpt-oss-120b spent about 25 times the cost per correct answer on the distractor counting task, while its accuracy was 7.5 percentage points lower (not significant).59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1007562API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1007562MCP
get_claim(id=1007562)