Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Retriever AI officially claims its accuracy exceeds OpenAI, Anthropic, and Muse, that it is 5 times faster than them, and that its cost is only 1/300 of theirs.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/28/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn a test checking whether AI-modified code could be accepted by a project, Opus 5.5 using the default setting scored slightly higher than Astra's best publicly available score, and the cost per task was approximately one-fifth of Astra's.66% similarUnverifiedSpeculative decoding technology makes the speed approximately 1.6 to 1.8 times faster, and in actual tests the large model accepted the small assistant's guesses approximately 79% of the time66% similarUnverifiedThe figures of 76x cost reduction and 5x speed improvement published by Asana come from its internal test environment, and actual performance will vary depending on use case, call patterns, and degree of optimization.65% similarUnverifiedOn the TasteVal benchmark, Opus 5.5 performed at roughly twice the human expert baseline, but task verification is fast and cheap, the human baseline does not include top-tier researchers, and the experiment scale was only 40 GPU hours and a single H100.65% similarUnverified英伟达H100相比A100算力提升约3倍，能效比提升约5倍65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1027358API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1027358MCP
get_claim(id=1027358)