Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Against the backdrop of surging submission volumes, ACs have been given the authority to screen and remove papers before review begins, and desk rejection is a product of this authority.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/14/2027
Sources
Top AI Conferences Plagued by "Desk Rejects": ICLR Submission Chaos and the Peer Review Dilemma
redditr/MachineLearning10/16/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn past collaborations between AI companies and external evaluators, a publication veto was almost a default clause; companies would typically require reviewing draft assessment reports and have the right to delete sensitive content or block publication.65% similarUnverifiedAfter a rule is triggered there are two control modes: 'require approval' pauses the action until a reviewer releases it, while 'block outright' rejects it on the spot.62% similarUnverifiedICLR requires reviewers not to actively search for papers to confirm author identity, placing part of the double-blind responsibility on the reviewer side.62% similarUnverifiedThe ACLU's core positions on the issue of audio surveillance include: demanding clear data retention periods, prohibiting audio collection without judicial authorization, and ensuring independent third-party audits.59% similarUnverifiedICLR review rules generally prohibit authors from revealing their identity in the body of the paper, such as using phrasing like 'as shown in our previous work on arXiv'.58% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1042356API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1042356MCP
get_claim(id=1042356)