Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In a specific challenge the author observed, the Metrics tab showed an application with an overall score of 94% that still had 36 major correctness issues.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/31/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAfter implementing a process of downloading sources first and then letting the model write, 36 of 39 research citations were verbatim correct, and 95% of quotations in thinker biographies passed source verification.70% similarUnverified@servasyy_ai manually annotated 300 judgments and found that all 255 answers with confidence above 90% were correct, while the middle zone had too few samples to draw a conclusion.68% similarUnverifiedThe text-only baseline model achieved a decision accuracy of 33.33%, which improved to 93.33% after introducing dual evidence tokens.67% similarUnverifiedThe confidence reported by the model is severely disconnected from actual accuracy: the 95% confidence tier had an actual accuracy of 0%, while the 90% and 70% tiers both had an actual accuracy of 100%.67% similarUnverifiedA 95% confidence level means that if the same methodology were used to conduct 100 surveys, approximately 95 of them would produce results falling within the margin of error.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1054760API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1054760MCP
get_claim(id=1054760)