Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Oppenheimer's experiments (2006, doi:10.1002/acp.1178) found that ornate, abstruse articles were rated by readers as written by authors who were "less intelligent", with processing fluency as the mediating variable.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAt the time of release, the author stated that the work prioritized fun over scientific accuracy and is not a serious simulation of the real universe65% similarUnverifiedLater historians of physics noted that the internal consistency of Coulomb's original data was suspiciously ideal, sparking academic controversy over the authenticity of the experimental details.60% similarUnverifiedThe authors position the paper not as a complete theory of hallucination, but as addressing only the isolated mechanism of lossy recall of observed facts under limited memory.60% similarUnverified卡尼曼在《思考，快与慢》中引用均值回归原理，揭示人类倾向于将均值回归误读为某种干预的效果59% similarUnverified主动提取练习被认知科学家亨利·罗迪格证明效果是被动重读的两倍以上59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1058206API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1058206MCP
get_claim(id=1058206)