Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
B1 made 181 predictions with confidence no lower than 0.9, of which 1 was wrong; B2 made 188, of which 2 were wrong; a better average does not automatically mean fewer high-confidence errors, and 0.9 is not a ready-made production threshold.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/16/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe relationship between the standard error of Monte Carlo estimation and the number of simulations N is that the standard error is proportional to 1/√N.72% similarUnverifiedCompared to the average of the two graphs, the conditioned response graph reduces mean squared prediction error by 53.6% on Gemma-2-9B.72% similarUnverifiedLaya has an issue of high confidence when making errors, with instances of giving a confidence score of 0.952 despite a score of 0.70% similarUnverifiedOn the frozen test set, the delivered system (LoRA + rules) caught 73 (recall 0.86), with 11 confident errors, 1 "not sure", and 0 false positives, outperforming the keyword baseline, LoRA-only fine-tuning, and zero-shot Qwen3.5-4B.70% similarUnverifiedAmong the panel of ten LLM reviewers used as the primary reviewer pool in the study, the average pairwise correlation coefficient of reviewer errors was 0.21.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1064021API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1064021MCP
get_claim(id=1064021)