Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the correspondence rate with papers published after the model's cutoff date, DiscoveryRSI-27B reached 6.3%, GPT-6 was 2.5%, and Claude Opus 5 was 2.3%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/17/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedEarly GPT-4 had a pass rate of only 1.7% on SWE-bench, Claude 3 Opus approximately 4.8%, and it was not until mid-2024 that the 20% mark was surpassed.73% similarUnverifiedIn the segment where gains exceeded +30%, average model predictions ranged from 27.3% for Claude Opus 5.5 to 61.6% for GPT-5.4 mini, while the actual rise rate was 42.8%.72% similarUnverifiedClaude Opus 5在智能体搜索BrowseComp上得分30.8%，与GPT系列基本持平；工具增强多学科推理64.7%；生物学人类可解问题上高达90.1%72% similarUnverifiedOrder effect: swapping the order of two answers, GPT-5.4 changed its verdict 11.4% of the time on one benchmark and 10.5% on another; Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Opus 4.6 were between 2.0% and 3.8%.72% similarUnverifiedIn Automation Bench at medium reasoning intensity, GPT-6.1 Sol scored 35.4%, which is 2.2 percentage points higher than Opus 5.5 at one-third of the cost.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1064815API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1064815MCP
get_claim(id=1064815)