Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In AI-Node-Sentinel, after plugging in a fake provider that perfectly follows the prompt and returns DRAIN_NODE with 0.95 confidence, the final action is still NEEDS_HUMAN_REVIEW and confidence is still 0.0; only the rationale has [LLM] text appended, showing that the LLM has no voting power.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAn agent that completed normally, returned a well-structured result, and reported that it could not access the document then still reasoned based on snippets, and downstream agents treated its output as established fact, with no alerting mechanism detecting this error.61% similarUnverifiedThe decision model takes a state and up to five typed questions (noul/choice/score) and returns answers and confidence in a single forward pass, generating no text, so output_tokens is 0.61% similarUnverifiedSchema-only post-hoc correction can achieve a number of safe completions comparable to verifier feedback; possible reasons are that the model's raw output already contains the correct content but in a messy format, or that verifier feedback mainly imposes format constraints rather than providing new reasoning signals.60% similarUnverifiedQwen3.8-27B偶尔会返回缺少闭合括号的JSON截断（如`{"findings":[]`），在40个审查回答中出现5次，仅出现在空回答上，与MTP和presence penalty无关，是模型自身提前终止。59% similarUnverifiedThe corrected error-correction workflow creates an independent fragment attributed to the Correction node and marked with a human source, replaces the claim to reference that fragment, and starts with confidence 0.0 while carrying confidence_kind.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1065598API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1065598MCP
get_claim(id=1065598)