Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Under the Pro subscription quota, GPT-6.1-Terra's quota consumption for completing a full 3D parking lot webpage build task is only about 1%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
11/1/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/15/2026
Sources
GPT-6.1-Terra Hands-On Test: A Balance of Cost-Effectiveness and Speed
bilibili不吃辣的Chris10/27/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe uploader commented that the 3D parking lot quickly produced by GPT-6.1-Terra meets expectations, but the result is not as good as DeepSeek's, and further adjustments in front-end design are needed to improve the result.71% similarUnverifiedThe finished 3D parking lot webpage generated by GPT-6.1-Terra supports freely switching viewpoints, zooming in to view details, and clicking a vehicle to switch to a nearby viewpoint.69% similarUnverifiedIn actual testing, when GPT-6.1 Terra reproduced the "sunset at the wheel tower of Lisiben" image generation task, the images were more refined but took four times as long as the previous generation, with 48% more token consumption.66% similarUnverifiedOn the offline OS World 2.1 desktop operation benchmark, GPT-6.1 Terra reaches 74.2%.66% similarUnverifiedFor users who have already subscribed to a commercial service, the marginal cost of using GPT Image 2.5 for inpainting is nearly zero.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1122017API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1122017MCP
get_claim(id=1122017)