Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The uploader commented that the 3D parking lot quickly produced by GPT-6.1-Terra meets expectations, but the result is not as good as DeepSeek's, and further adjustments in front-end design are needed to improve the result.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
11/1/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/30/2027
Sources
GPT-6.1-Terra Hands-On Test: A Balance of Cost-Effectiveness and Speed
bilibili不吃辣的Chris10/27/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe uploader believes DeepSeek scores very high on front-end design-related tasks and is a more suitable choice than GPT-6.1-Terra.73% similarUnverifiedUnder the Pro subscription quota, GPT-6.1-Terra's quota consumption for completing a full 3D parking lot webpage build task is only about 1%.71% similarUnverifiedGPT-6.1-Terra is positioned as suitable for cost-sensitive backend processing and automated operation scenarios that require fast responses, rather than as an all-rounder.71% similarUnverifiedThe finished 3D parking lot webpage generated by GPT-6.1-Terra supports freely switching viewpoints, zooming in to view details, and clicking a vehicle to switch to a nearby viewpoint.69% similarVerifiedGPT-6 Astra falls short of dedicated tools in professional detail control for 3D modeling, including topology quality, UV layout, and material accuracy.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1122024API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1122024MCP
get_claim(id=1122024)