Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
NeurIPS and ICML use double-blind review, while ICLR uses open review (OpenReview), with review comments and author responses fully public throughout.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/5/2026
First Seen
Sources
How Many Top-Tier Conference Papers Does It Take to Graduate from a Top U.S. ML PhD? A Reddit Debate
redditr/MachineLearning11/5/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedICLR is known for its 'open review' (OpenReview) mechanism: all submissions, review comments and author responses are public throughout, and anyone can browse and comment.79% similarVerifiedICLR achieves transparency in open peer review through OpenReview75% similarUnverifiedThe OpenReview platform has promoted open review practices by making review comments publicly visible.67% similarUnverifiedOpenReview has been widely adopted by top machine learning conferences such as ICLR.66% similarUnverifiedOpenReview was developed and maintained by a team at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and has become core infrastructure for NeurIPS, ICLR, and ACL-series conferences.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1138740API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1138740MCP
get_claim(id=1138740)