OpenReview
An open scholarly peer-review platform jointly developed by the University of Massachusetts Amherst and New York University. It publicly archives papers, reviewer comments, author responses, and discussions in a searchable format, supporting transparent review processes for top-tier venues such as ICLR and NeurIPS.
Core Facts
Timeline (last 90 days)
OpenReview is an open peer review platform widely adopted by current top AI conferences; ICLR has used it fully since 2018, and conferences such as NeurIPS and ICML have gradually followed suit.
OpenReview's account system is tied to author identity and institutional email addresses, providing a technical basis for conferences to identify linked accounts.
Under the OpenReview mechanism, supplementary materials submitted alongside a paper are in principle visible to the community simultaneously with the paper, unless access restrictions are set by the platform or conference policy.
ICLR papers become publicly visible to the community as soon as the formal review process begins, which roughly coincides with the point at which reviewers start their work.
OpenReview archives papers, review comments, author responses, and discussion posts in a searchable manner and makes them publicly accessible, allowing anyone to register an account and post public comments.
ICLR adopts an OpenReview mechanism, under which papers, review comments, author responses, and discussions are visible to the entire academic community during specific stages.
OpenReview is an open academic review platform jointly developed by the University of Massachusetts Amherst and New York University.
Some supplementary materials may be accessible only to reviewers and area chairs (ACs), rather than being visible to the entire community.
ICLR achieves transparency in open peer review through OpenReview
Researchers should rely on notifications from AAAI's official system (such as the CMT or OpenReview platform) rather than community rumors
9 more timeline events
All Facts (19)
ICLR achieves transparency in open peer review through OpenReview
75%UnverifiedICLR uses OpenReview's open peer review, where all submitted papers, reviewer comments, author responses, and final decisions are publicly visible, but reviewer identities remain anonymous.
70%UnverifiedOpenReview's account system is tied to author identity and institutional email addresses, providing a technical basis for conferences to identify linked accounts.
50%UnverifiedOpenReview is an open peer review platform widely adopted by current top AI conferences; ICLR has used it fully since 2018, and conferences such as NeurIPS and ICML have gradually followed suit.
50%UnverifiedICLR papers become publicly visible to the community as soon as the formal review process begins, which roughly coincides with the point at which reviewers start their work.
50%UnverifiedSome supplementary materials may be accessible only to reviewers and area chairs (ACs), rather than being visible to the entire community.
50%UnverifiedICLR adopts an OpenReview mechanism, under which papers, review comments, author responses, and discussions are visible to the entire academic community during specific stages.
50%UnverifiedOpenReview is an open academic review platform jointly developed by the University of Massachusetts Amherst and New York University.
50%UnverifiedOpenReview archives papers, review comments, author responses, and discussion posts in a searchable manner and makes them publicly accessible, allowing anyone to register an account and post public comments.
50%UnverifiedUnder the OpenReview mechanism, supplementary materials submitted alongside a paper are in principle visible to the community simultaneously with the paper, unless access restrictions are set by the platform or conference policy.
50%UnverifiedResearchers should rely on notifications from AAAI's official system (such as the CMT or OpenReview platform) rather than community rumors
50%UnverifiedTMLR uses the OpenReview platform for open peer review, making the review process transparent and traceable.
50%UnverifiedConfirming a paper's acceptance status can be done by checking official notification emails, reading the Call for Papers, and logging into the submission system to view detailed information.
50%UnverifiedThe OpenReview platform was founded in 2013 by Andrew McCallum and others from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
50%UnverifiedA study published on OpenReview argues that the reasoning tokens generated by LLMs are fundamentally unrelated to human reasoning.
50%UnverifiedThe OpenReview platform was founded in 2013 by Andrew McCallum and others at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, making submitted papers, review comments, author responses, and final decisions publicly visible.
50%UnverifiedThe OpenReview platform was founded in 2013 by Andrew McCallum and others from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, improving review quality through transparency.
50%UnverifiedICLR is known for its open review process on OpenReview, with a submission deadline of approximately September–October and the conference held in the following spring; all submitted papers, reviews, author responses, and final decisions are publicly visible.
50%UnverifiedOpenReview等开放评审平台的兴起是学术界试图提高评审透明度和问责性的尝试
50%