Unverified83% confidenceTradeoffTime unknown
浓缩型（60%-90%浓度）vs普通型（30%）：追求高剂量、减少每日粒数、降低多余油脂负担选浓缩型；浓度越高越依赖EE/rTG工艺，工艺差的浓缩型反而氧化风险和溶剂残留风险更高
1
Sources
83%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
-
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified浓度越高纯化越充分（重金属、多氯联苯残留越低）但价格越贵且多为EE型影响吸收；日常保健30-50%浓度rTG型即足够，无需盲目追求90%浓度89% similarUnverified浓度越高纯度越好但通常为EE型（吸收率打折），rTG型吸收好但浓度做到80%以上工艺成本极高。日常保健选TG/rTG型60%浓度平衡最佳，追求高剂量降脂可接受EE型高浓度87% similarUnverified浓度越高（EE/rTG）吸收和纯度越好但价格越贵，且高浓度乙酯型可能吸收打折扣；日常保健用30%-50%浓度TG型即可，无需盲目追求85%高浓度85% similarUnverified浓度越高（如90% EE型）单粒剂量越大但吸收形式越差、越易氧化；rTG型吸收好、抗氧化好但浓度和剂量受限——高剂量与高吸收难两全85% similarUnverified浓度越高（如rTG型80%+浓度）纯度和吸收越好但成本高；普通TG/EE型浓度30%左右更便宜。日常保健用普通浓度足够，需大剂量长期服用者选高浓度可减少每日粒数和多余脂肪摄入84% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/188499API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/188499MCP
get_claim(id=188499)