Expired90% confidenceFactTime unknown
In the SaaS dashboard test, GLM 4.7 consumed only 23,000 tokens, far fewer than Gemini and Claude.
1
Sources
90%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Frontend UI Generation Showdown: GLM 4.7 vs Claude Opus vs Gemini vs Minimax — Who Wins?
bilibiliGoldenSpiderAI
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedGLM 4.7 and Minimax M2.1 cost less than 1/25 of Claude Opus 4.5, yet achieved better results on multiple tasks.72% similarUnverifiedOn mainstream benchmarks such as MMLU and HumanEval, the score gaps among Claude 3.5, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Grok-2 have been compressed to within the range of statistical error.65% similarUnverifiedOn the Frontiers-WE benchmark, the gap between GLM-5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 has narrowed to less than one point.62% similarUnverifiedM2.7 scored 56.22% on the SWE-bench Pro benchmark, surpassing Gemini 3.1 Pro.61% similarUnverifiedIn evaluations, Gemma 4 31B surpassed models of similar parameter scale such as Zhipu GLM and DeepSeek V3.2, and performed comparably to large models such as Gemini 5 and Kimi 2.5.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/20496API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/20496MCP
get_claim(id=20496)