Unverified90% confidenceFactTime unknown
在SaaS仪表盘测试中，GLM 4.7的Token消耗仅23,000，远低于Gemini和Claude
1
Sources
90%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/30/2026
Sources
前端UI生成实测：GLM 4.7、Claude Opus、Gemini、Minimax谁最强？
bilibiliGoldenSpiderAI
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedGLM 4.7和Minimax M2.1的费用不到Claude Opus 4.5的1/25，却在多个任务中取得了更好的结果72% similarUnverified在MMLU、HumanEval等主流基准测试上，Claude 3.5、GPT-4o、Gemini 1.5 Pro、Grok-2之间的分差已压缩至统计误差范围内65% similarUnverified在 Frontiers-WE 基准上，GLM-5.2 与 Claude Opus 4.8 的差距缩小到不足一分62% similarUnverifiedM2.7在SWE-bench Pro基准测试中得分56.22%，超过了Gemini 3.1 Pro61% similarUnverifiedGemma 4 31B 在评测中超越了智谱 GLM、DeepSeek V3.2 等同参数量级模型，并与 Gemini 5、Kimi 2.5 等大模型表现相当61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/20496API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/20496MCP
get_claim(id=20496)