Expired80% confidenceFactTime unknown
In a 3D smart city monitoring dashboard generation test, GLM-5.1 scored 9.8, DeepSeek V4 scored 9.0, and GPT 5.5 scored 9.5.
1
Sources
80%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the 3D parkour game generation task, GPT 5.5 produced a blank screen in both attempts, scoring 0, while DeepSeek V4 Pro and MiniMax M3 tied with 7 points each.76% similarVerifiedDeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1 have reached performance levels comparable to GPT-4o on multiple benchmarks.72% similarUnverifiedOn frontend and visual tasks (Three.js animations, SVG graphics), GPT-5.6 models generally only scored six to seven points, while competitor Fable 5 consistently reached nine to ten points.71% similarUnverifiedGPT-5.6's coding capability reached 91.9% on key benchmarks and its safety evaluation CyberGym score reached 85.6%, both surpassing competitor Nexus 5.71% similarUnverifiedIn the DeepSWE benchmark, GPT 5.5 tops the leaderboard with a pass rate of approximately 70%, leading Opus 4.7 by more than 15 percentage points.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/25548API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/25548MCP
get_claim(id=25548)