Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
Previously, GPT frequently exhibited problems when generating SVGs such as distorted proportions, misaligned lines, and incorrectly positioned elements, and even placed car wheels in the wrong positions.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
GPT-5.6 Pro Hands-On Review: In-Depth Evaluation of Game Development, 3D Modeling, and SVG Design Capabilities
bilibili零度解说6/21/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedGPT-5.4及更早版本在提取文档中的数字时频繁出错，包括小数点位置偏移、千分位分隔符误读、负号遗漏等问题68% similarUnverifiedIn the pure SVG isometric projection miniature city drawing task, GPT 5.5 scored 5/10, with an acceptable number of elements but random building layout and inconsistent shadow colors.68% similarUnverifiedGPT-4V 等多模态模型在直接输出屏幕坐标时存在显著的空间定位偏差68% similarUnverifiedOn frontend and visual tasks (Three.js animations, SVG graphics), GPT-5.6 models generally only scored six to seven points, while competitor Fable 5 consistently reached nine to ten points.66% similarUnverifiedGPT-5.6's clear weaknesses are concentrated in front-end visual tasks, with Sol scoring only six or seven points on projects such as Three.js and SVG, while Fable 5 can score nine or even full marks.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/42979API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/42979MCP
get_claim(id=42979)