Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
在ICLR 2023年的实践中，约有5%-8%的投稿在进入完整评审前被桌面拒稿
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/11/2026
First Seen
Sources
ML顶会为何不限制投稿数量？评审质量危机根源解析
redditr/MachineLearning7/10/2026
Related Claims
Unverified开放内容给AI爬取获得引用曝光的概率不足5.2%64% similarUnverified多项实证研究表明顶级会议的接收决定存在显著随机性，估计约50%的被接收论文在重新评审时可能会被拒绝63% similarUnverifiedThe results of the NeurIPS 2022 consistency experiment showed that approximately 50% of papers received completely different accept/reject decisions between the two groups of reviewers62% similarUnverified多项针对ACL、EMNLP、ICLR等会议的统计分析显示，rebuttal导致审稿人实质性提分的概率通常低于20%59% similarUnverifiedIn a 2023 paper, Anthropic systematically measured sycophancy bias and found that even given obviously incorrect premises, a substantial proportion of responses from most mainstream models still chose to comply with the user.57% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/486613API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/486613MCP
get_claim(id=486613)