Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
多项实证研究表明顶级会议的接收决定存在显著随机性，估计约50%的被接收论文在重新评审时可能会被拒绝
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/16/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe results of the NeurIPS 2022 consistency experiment showed that approximately 50% of papers received completely different accept/reject decisions between the two groups of reviewers79% similarUnverifiedTriplebyte data shows that the variance in pass rates for the same candidate across different companies' interviews is extremely large, indicating that interview outcomes have significant randomness.69% similarUnverified斯坦福大学人机交互研究组实验显示，即便自动化系统建议明显错误，参与者采纳错误建议的概率仍高达60%以上67% similarVerifiedIn 2014, the NeurIPS program committee conducted a review consistency experiment in which approximately 10% (about 166 papers) were reviewed by two independent program committees, and the two groups' acceptance decisions were only approximately 57% consistent.64% similarUnverified多项针对ACL、EMNLP、ICLR等会议的统计分析显示，rebuttal导致审稿人实质性提分的概率通常低于20%64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/527915API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/527915MCP
get_claim(id=527915)