Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
A 2020 study from North Carolina State University found that the correlation coefficient between algorithm interview pass rates and whether candidates prepared by practicing problems was r=0.62, while the correlation coefficient with subsequent work code quality scores was only r=0.12.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/9/2026
First Seen
Sources
Merge：AI驱动的代码审查招聘评估平台深度解析
Related Claims
UnverifiedA meta-analysis by Schmidt & Hunter (1998) found that general cognitive ability tests have a predictive validity of r=0.51, while work sample tests reach r=0.5468% similarUnverifiedFrank Schmidt和John Hunter在1998年发表的元分析研究（涵盖85年的研究数据）发现工作样本测试的预测效度约为0.54，结构化面试约为0.51，非结构化面试约为0.38，学历证书约为0.1066% similarUnverifiedThe predictive validity of structured interviews is significantly higher than that of unstructured interviews, with a validity coefficient reaching 0.51, compared to approximately 0.38 for unstructured interviews.64% similarUnverifiedThe accuracy data in the test has an error margin of approximately ±8–10 percentage points at n=100 sample size (based on a 95% confidence-level binomial confidence interval).64% similarUnverified根据美国数学学会（AMS）的年度就业调查，前20名数学系的博士毕业生获得R1研究型大学tenure-track职位的概率是普通院校毕业生的5-8倍63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/712727API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/712727MCP
get_claim(id=712727)