Expired50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The evaluator found that GLM 5.2 remains strong in pure coding, but HY3 outperforms it in tasks involving aesthetics, physics feel, and simulation texture.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/13/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/11/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedHY3 still lags behind GLM 5.2 (the current top-level open-source model) in overall performance.73% similarUnverifiedIn actual performance tests, GLM 4.6 far outperformed Claude 4.5 Haiku.70% similarUnverifiedLFM2.5在多项基准测试中展现出与体量高达其4倍模型相当的竞争力69% similarUnverifiedGLM 4.6's performance on code evaluation benchmarks such as HumanEval, MBPP, and SWE-bench, as well as comprehensive capability benchmarks such as MMLU and GPQA, is on par with Claude 3.4 and Claude 3.4.5.68% similarUnverifiedGLM-4.7 surpasses DeepSeek V3.2 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 in code capability benchmarks.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/495163API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/495163MCP
get_claim(id=495163)