Unverified85% confidenceTradeoffTime unknown
SAS/SDS题量各20题、采用4级评分，完成度和可操作性好，但报告颗粒度粗，不如PHQ-9/GAD-7在国际研究中引用广泛和分级精细
1
Sources
85%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
-
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedSAS（焦虑自评）和SDS（抑郁自评）为20题量表，标准分需乘1.25换算，SAS标准分≥50、SDS≥53为界值；相比PHQ-9/GAD-7更适合首次筛查但不适合频繁复测（信度对短期变化不敏感）85% similarUnverifiedSAS采用4级评分、20题结构，原始分乘以1.25取整得标准分，≥50为轻度焦虑、≥60中度、≥70重度；这是国内临床广泛采用的划界标准79% similarUnverifiedPHQ-9共9题采用0-3分四级评分，总分0-27分；GAD-7共7题同样0-3分评分，总分0-21分，两者均为WHO及各国指南推荐的一线筛查工具且已有官方中文修订版68% similarUnverifiedGemma 4 31B outperforms models of similar parameter counts including Zhipu GLM and DeepSeek V3.2 on benchmark scores.60% similarUnverified在SaaS仪表盘测试中，GLM 4.7的Token消耗仅23,000，远低于Gemini和Claude59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/753885API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/753885MCP
get_claim(id=753885)