Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Moderators take a pragmatic approach to distinguishing 'AI-assisted' from 'AI mass-produced spam,' with the key being whether the content reflects the author's genuine thinking and effort.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/30/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified发帖者建议采用百分比式披露AI参与程度，超越是否使用AI的二元判断75% similarUnverifiedAI can rapidly produce 'complete' text, but not necessarily a story with 'tension'; genuine literary tension requires active design by a human author.74% similarUnverifiedarXiv's new policy does not comprehensively prohibit the use of AI tools to assist writing; the core criterion is whether the authors have responsibly reviewed and revised the AI-generated content.73% similarUnverifiedAI should be assigned mechanical, verifiable, low-creativity work, while core thinking, judgment, and innovation are left to the researchers themselves.73% similarUnverified创作者应在AI初稿基础上进行深度改写并注入个人观点、案例和语言习惯，让内容通过人的过滤而非照搬机器输出72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/826665API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/826665MCP
get_claim(id=826665)