Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
According to official data, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next surpasses Claude Opus 4.6 Max in both text and multimodal domains with only 6B activated parameters, and its training cost is only one-ninth of Qwen3.7-Plus.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/5/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/4/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedQwen 3.6 Max has an end-to-end accuracy of only 12.3% in neutral mode70% similarUnverifiedQwen 3.6's performance in general programming capability, development skills, multi-turn agent-enhanced capability, and agent task testing leads Qwen 3.5 in many aspects and approaches or exceeds Claude 4.5 Opus on certain metrics.69% similarUnverifiedQwen3.8-Flash-Next achieved scores of 58.7 and 62.5 on the SWE-bench 1.1 and SWE-bench Pro evaluations, respectively.68% similarUnverifiedQwen3.5's parameter activation rate is 4.3%, while DeepSeek V3's 671B model has an activation rate of 5.5%.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/862166API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/862166MCP
get_claim(id=862166)