Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The Mozilla Public License (MPL) only requires that modified portions be open-sourced, striking a balance between permissive and strict licenses.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/6/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedLibreOffice adopts open-source licenses such as MPL (Mozilla Public License), which carry explicit distribution obligations, such as providing access to source code and retaining copyright notices.72% similarUnverifiedOpen-source licenses (such as GPL and MIT License) impose restrictions on the manner in which software is used through contractual terms.69% similarUnverifiedOSI对开源的认定要求许可证允许自由使用、修改和分发，且不得对特定领域或用途加以限制66% similarUnverifiedCopyleft licenses (such as GPL, LGPL, and AGPL) require that derivative works be released under the same or compatible open-source licenses.65% similarVerifiedThe Apache 2.0 license requires modifications to be documented, while the GPL license requires that derivative works also be open-sourced64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/868159API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/868159MCP
get_claim(id=868159)