Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
The U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission held that restricting independent campaign expenditures by corporations and unions was unconstitutional, fundamentally transforming the campaign finance system.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/10/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe Supreme Court's 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission held that limiting independent political expenditures by corporations and unions violates the First Amendment.78% similarUnverifiedIn the 1995 case McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that anonymously distributing political pamphlets is a constitutionally protected form of speech.60% similarUnverifiedSuper PACs originated from the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.51% similarUnverified美国联邦法院对提交虚假引用律师的制裁法律依据主要源自《联邦民事诉讼规则》第11条（Rule 11）51% similarUnverifiedThe Clayton Act of 1914 further elaborated the provisions prohibiting anti-competitive behavior, including price discrimination, exclusive dealing, and mergers that harm competition.50% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/885944API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/885944MCP
get_claim(id=885944)