Citizens United v. FEC
A 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that held political donations to be speech protected by the First Amendment, removing limits on corporate and union political contributions and giving rise to super PACs.
Timeline (last 90 days)
The 2010 'Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission' ruling lifted the cap on independent political spending by corporations and unions, giving rise to the prosperity of super PACs and dark money organizations.
Super PACs were born after the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC ruling, allowing corporations, unions and individuals to contribute unlimited amounts to them, as long as these funds are not directly coordinated with a candidate's campaign team.
The U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission held that restricting independent campaign expenditures by corporations and unions was unconstitutional, fundamentally transforming the campaign finance system.
All Facts (3)
The 2010 'Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission' ruling lifted the cap on independent political spending by corporations and unions, giving rise to the prosperity of super PACs and dark money organizations.
50%UnverifiedSuper PACs were born after the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC ruling, allowing corporations, unions and individuals to contribute unlimited amounts to them, as long as these funds are not directly coordinated with a candidate's campaign team.
50%UnverifiedThe U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission held that restricting independent campaign expenditures by corporations and unions was unconstitutional, fundamentally transforming the campaign finance system.
50%