Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On the MCP Atlas benchmark, Glimmer scored 75.5, Gemma 4 scored 54.2, and Qwen 3.6 scored 62.5.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/10/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedMuse Glimmer scores 75.5 on the MCP Atlas tool-calling benchmark, leading Qwen 3.6; scores 74.6 on agentic search tasks; and scores 94.7 on the AIME mathematical reasoning benchmark.78% similarUnverifiedGlimmer's intelligence index score of 35 surpasses Gemma 2 27B (30) and nearly matches Qwen 2.5 (36), with Qwen 2.5 72B topping the leaderboard at 38.70% similarUnverified在测评中Qwen 3 Max领先Kimi K3（77.5%）、GLM（75%）和GPT-4系列（71.25%）66% similarUnverifiedThe Zhipu GLM series continuously refined three generations at the 358B parameter scale from GLM4.5 to 4.7, after which GLM5 doubled to 754B.66% similarVerifiedQwen3.5's parameter activation rate is 4.3%, while DeepSeek V3's 671B model has an activation rate of 5.5%.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/909116API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/909116MCP
get_claim(id=909116)