Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The ruling in Carpenter v. United States primarily addressed cell-site location data, and whether it fully applies to ALPR systems remains a subject of legal dispute.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/17/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedThe 2018 case Carpenter v. United States ruled that obtaining long-term cell phone location records requires a warrant, partially limiting the third-party doctrine.74% similarUnverifiedIn 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Carpenter v. United States that law enforcement obtaining cell tower location data without a warrant constitutes an unconstitutional search.71% similarVerifiedIn the 2018 case Carpenter v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court established that the aggregation of continuous location data constitutes a substantial intrusion into personal privacy, and government access is subject to Fourth Amendment constraints.63% similarUnverifiedIn 2024, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ruled that using AI-generated voices for telemarketing constitutes illegal conduct.58% similarUnverified第三方原则源于1979年的Smith v. Maryland案，最高法院裁定电话拨号记录不受第四修正案保护，因为用户自愿将号码信息传递给电信公司55% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/930249API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/930249MCP
get_claim(id=930249)